Scientific studies have established that marijuana can help arthritis and glaucoma and assist cancer patients. A study dating back to 2000 BC China claimed that marijuana can “undo rheumatism”. (Russo) A study was performed on seventeen subjects where fourteen reported that the marijuana helped their arthritis. (Russo) The use of cannabis in arthritis patients has reduced the use of potentially harmful anti-inflammatory drugs, thus making the drug a true lifesaver. (Russo)
According to sources, “14% of all blindness in America is from glaucoma, a progressive loss of vision.” (Medical Marijuana) Tests were executed to see how marijuana affected people with glaucoma; they found that the drug lowers the intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients, which relieves tension on the eyes to clear ones vision. (Ophthalmology) This reduction allows an increase in visibility and decreases the amount of potential blindness in patients. With such wonderful proven benefits, how do we continue to outlaw this substance?
Cancer patients of all sorts have suffered from nausea as a result of their chemotherapy. For patients to heal, they must undergo the pains of nausea: However, the use of marijuana has been known to minimize the nausea and increase the will to fight the disease. Not only does cannabis reduce the nausea in patients, it has also been discovered to cut the size of cancerous tumors in the lungs in half and “significantly reduce the ability of the cancer to spread.” (Science Daily) The use of marijuana for medical purposes is clearly necessary and without it the government is to be held responsible for the pain and suffering of the sick.
Marijuana can help relieve disease in some, sickness in many, and pain in most, so why is it still illegal? Medical marijuana should truly be taken into consideration as an impressive option. The herb helps so many, but because it has hurt a few it is immediately deemed illegal in all aspects. Personally, if I was suffering from lung cancer and I knew that smoking marijuana could accelerate the healing process, and cut my tumor in half, I would – without doubt – smoke marijuana… who wouldn’t?
Tobacco causes more than 430,000 overdose deaths per year (Kavanagh) whereas marijuana has taken zero lives due to overdoses. With this in mind, why is it that the government has outlawed the safer of the two drugs? No rhyme or reason can be found to argue the validity of their lawmaking, yet many can be found to oppose them. Tobacco, “the leading preventable cause of death” (Kavanagh), contains 10 milligrams of Nicotine (the addictive drug within tobacco) in each cigarette, but one drop of pure nicotine would kill you. (NIDA) On the other hand, marijuana contains no addictive properties, especially none that would kill you. How, in their right mind, could the lawmakers of our country allow tobacco to be used freely among our adult population, yet restrict the use of marijuana to absolutely no one? It seems oxymoronic nonetheless.
Truth be told, the only reason marijuana has such a negative connotation among my generation is that we have been conditioned to dislike the drug. From the youngest of ages we have been told that the herb is bad for our health, that it only causes harm in the world and that it will kill us. Conversely, quite the opposite is true: It helps many peoples’ health conditions, it does an incredible amount of good in our world, and it will in no way kill us. In 75% of the elementary schools in our country a D.A.R.E program has been implemented to keep kids off drugs. The program, to be blunt, is based on lies. The claims that the organization makes are inaccurate and hyperbolized, to say the least. According to a fact sheet put together by the D.A.R.E organization “no scientific evidence has been found that demonstrates increased benefits and/or diminished risks of marijuana use to treat glaucoma,” (DARE) yet all the research I have done has proven otherwise. An article in a 1997 issue of Rolling Stone could not have said it better; “Spokesmen are quoted by journalists and appear on the evening news and on talk shows, making frightening claims about marijuana’s harmful effects, spinning unproven theories and, in some cases, distorting the known truth in an effort to demonize even casual users of pot.” (Nadelmann)
The argument of legality has carried on over many years and shows few signs of coming to an end anytime soon. Personally, I feel that it is time for change among the laws of marijuana use, whether it be for medicinal purposes only, or recreational use also: Whichever it may be, it is a step in the right direction and things can only improve from there on.
DARE. "Drug Information." May 2003. DARE. 11 November 2008
Kavanagh, Dr. Kevin T. "Cost to Society." 2 September 2008. Tobacco Facts. 11 November 2008
Medical Marijuana. Medical Facts. 2003.
Nadelmann, Ethan A. "Reefer Madness 1997: The New Bag of Scare Tactics." Rolling Stone 20 February 1997: 51.
NIDA. "NIDA for Teens: Facts on Drugs - Nicotine." June 2003. NIDA for Teens. 11 November 2008
Ophthalmology, American Academy of. "Marijuana in the Treatment of Glaucoma." 2003. Eye Care America.
Russo, Ethan. "Arthritis and Medical Marijuana." 2008. Medical Marijuana Testimonials.
Science Daily. "Marijuana Cuts Lung Cancer Tumor Growth In Half, Study Shows." 17 April 2007. Science Daily. 11 November 2008